Union stops Brosius-Gersdorf: Allegations of plagiarism throw shadows on choice!
Union stops Brosius-Gersdorf: Allegations of plagiarism throw shadows on choice!
In the current debate about the nomination of Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf for the Federal Constitutional Court, tensions between the political parties are emerging. The Union faction plans to postpone the vote on the nomination. This reports rbb24 . The reason for the desired postponement is allegations of plagiarism against the SPD candidate, who should not be cleared before a final clarification.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz (CDU) and Jens Spahn, the group leader of the CDU/CSU, have announced this step of the SPD parliamentary group. Brosius-Gersdorf is not only criticized because of the allegations of plagiarism; Your political positions also ensure controversy. In particular, their attitude to the reform of the right to abortion and the case law of the Constitutional Court regarding the wearing of Muslim headscarves in civil service are controversial in conservative circles. In addition, the Catholic Church expressed concern about its nomination.
elections and nomination procedures
Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf was nominated as one of three candidates for a judge at the Federal Constitutional Court. The Bundestag election committee agreed on this nomination on Monday evening. The election of the new judges should take place on Friday. In addition to Brosius-Gersdorf, the two other candidates Ann-Kathrin Kaufhold from Munich and Günter Spinner are from the Federal Labor Court. The choice is secret and required for a two -thirds majority in the Bundestag.
The complexity of the nomination increases. There are already significant reservations about Brosius-Gersdorf within the Union, which is also evident in the agreement that she cannot become President or Vice President of the Federal Constitutional Court. Ex-Federal Minister of Health Ulla Schmidt from the SPD also criticized the nomination and emphasized the importance of human dignity, which in her opinion already applies in the womb. Opponents of abortion even announced protests in front of the Reichstag building.
political implications
In view of this situation, the nomination process is considered in another context. The co-chair of the left, van Aken, calls for a change in the nomination key for judges at the Federal Constitutional Court. In a letter to the political, SPD and Greens' parliamentary groups, he speaks for the fact that the left and the AfD should be more heard in future nominations. The previous right of proposal is based on the strength of the political groups, but it is found that the left and the AfD have not yet been taken into account. In view of the political balance of power in the new Bundestag, where Union, SPD and Greens do not have a two -thirds majority, it becomes clear that they will be dependent on the choice of votes from the left. This could affect the consent to the nomination of Brosius-Gersdorf and the need for new political alliances in the future. This topic is gaining in importance through the upcoming elections and the associated strategic decisions, which could shape the current political landscape in Germany. Deutschlandfunk illuminates this dynamic in its reporting.| Details | |
|---|---|
| Ort | Berlin, Deutschland |
| Quellen | |
Kommentare (0)