Social conservation regulations remain crucial in the Weitlingkiez!

Social conservation regulations remain crucial in the Weitlingkiez!

The district of Lichtenberg continues the social conservation regulations in the Weitlingkiez in order to counteract the impending pressure of the population of displacement. This decision is based on a comprehensive follow -up examination that was carried out between August 2024 and the first quarter of 2025. Both the urban planning situation and the infrastructure of the area were analyzed, accompanied by a full survey of the budget survey, in which 25.9 percent of the households wrote to participated. This is to be classified as high in Berlin-wide comparison, such as [berlin.de] (https://www.berlin.de/ba-lichtenberg/aktuelles/pressemaytreungen/2025/Pressemage department. 1574723.php) reports.

The social conservation regulations apply in the areas "Kaskelstraße", "Weitlingstraße" and "Fanningerstrasse" and is indefinitely. District City Councilor Camilla Schuler emphasizes the important role of this regulation for social cohesion in the Weitlingkiez. The analysis also shows that conservation goals were achieved, including the protection of the apartment key and the limited structural measures. Despite increasing rental prices and modernizations, the district remains a provider of cheap living space, whereby the population composition is diverse here, but also a high proportion of low -income households and poverty in old age was also determined.

risk of repression and tenant rights

The risk of repression in Lichtenberg remains high. Experts warn of the negative urban consequences that can be accompanied by a change in the resident population. This correlates with the challenges that can also be observed in other cities such as Hamburg, where the increase in population is forecast to 2 million inhabitants by 2035. Due to the increased demand, an increase in rental and purchase prices is expected in Hamburg as far as population groups, which are particularly less affordable for income. These developments illustrate the need for a social conservation regulation, which is introduced in the protective districts in accordance with Section 172 (1) BauGB in order to counter a further increase in repression, as Engelvoelkers.com reports.

The topic of conversion of rental apartments into condominiums is particularly critical because this can lead to financial burdens for the tenants. In the context of the displacement, it is crucial that tenants have a legal right of first refusal (§ 577 BGB) before selling their apartments to third parties. If you do not exercise this right, the apartments can be sold, which often leads to higher dismissal risks. Reports even show that personal needs are faked to drive down tenants in order to reduce or sell the apartments more profitable. Therefore, the protection against dismissal, which excludes termination due to its own needs three years after the conversion, is not comprehensive enough, such as [der-paritaetic.de] (https://www.der-paritaetische.de/themen/social-und-und-und- und- documented.

protective measures and expansion of tenant protection

The challenges in the housing market require an expansion of tenant protection. Demands are aimed at expanding the blocking deadlines for tenants in the event of their own needs. In addition, the concept of personal needs should be defined more clearly in order to limit the possibilities for termination by landlords. An effective example is the idea of ​​enabling state governments to issue conversion regulations in areas with tense housing markets in order to better protect tenants and strengthen their rights.

Overall, it can be seen that the social conservation regulations in Lichtenberg and other districts play an important role in the effort for social living space. In order to meet the requirements and challenges of the housing market, continuous measures and adjustments are necessary to protect and displace the interests of the tenants.