Corruption in Berlin: Employees of the naturalization authority arrested!

Corruption in Berlin: Employees of the naturalization authority arrested!

On July 17, 2025, the Berlin police carried out searches in two apartments in Marzahn and Rudow on behalf of the Attorney General. The reason for the investigation is suspected of bribery and bribery over three accused, including a 38-year-old employee of the State Office for Naturalization. The authorities are investigating these main suspects because of alleged bribery and incorrect disadvantage in office. It is believed that he was involved in the drainage of a family from Northern Macedonia, although the family had withdrawn their applications before. The special thing about this case is that the employee was not responsible for naturalization and yet issued naturalization certificates, provided them with a wrong signature and used a foreign seal.

The investigation also extends to possible abuses in dealing with foreigner files. The accused is said to have misused the access of a colleague in order to delete the files concerned. In addition to the main suspect, there are also two other suspects, a 39-year-old man and a 36-year-old woman, who are suspected that members of the naturalized family are. In these cases, a possible bribery and a love relationship between the employee and the naturalized woman are pointed out as a potential motive. During the searches, evidence, in particular electronic storage media, could be ensured. These evidence is now evaluated as part of the further investigation.

Legal foundations of false certification

In German law, the relevant legal foundations for false certification are specified in paragraphs 271 and 348 of the Criminal Code (StGB). These paragraphs guarantee the accuracy of public documents and protect the evidence that is awarded to them. Bösfürste officials who intentionally provide incorrect information in documents can be punished in accordance with Section 348. In addition, the aid or incitement for false certification by non-official supports is also punished under certain conditions. In particular, a perpetrator who is not a official himself must take on a responsible role in the wrong -scale in order to be punished. This can be the case, for example, if a non -official prompted the wrong -fashioned official.

The legal statements on false certification are particularly relevant in this case, since the exhibitions of the wrong documents and the abusive handling of files are the focus of the investigation. The objective fact comprises public documents, which also include naturalization certificates, and the actions that lead to incorrectly. The subjective fact, on the other hand, demands that the perpetrator act with intent.

corruption prevention in public service

The incident also raises basic questions about corruption in the public service. According to the Federal Civil Service Act (BBG) and the collective agreement in the public service (TVöD), civil servants are prohibited from accepting benefits; This does not even end with the termination of the civil servant relationship. In the event of violations, civil servants must issue benefits unless something else was decided in the criminal proceedings. An incorruptible public service is crucial for the trust of the population in state institutions. Corruption, as it is suspected in this case, leads to a potential loss of trust in the impartiality of the administration. It is therefore of immense importance that suitable compliance measures are taken to prevent corrupt actions.