Animal protection party demands fair visibility in Brandenburg-election
Animal protection party demands fair visibility in Brandenburg-election
The arguments between the animal protection party and the Bundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (RBB) enliven the political landscape in Brandenburg and raise questions about the visibility of smaller parties. In particular, the animal welfare party is not tired of reaffirming its demands, and pulls the Berlin Administrative Court. She strives to be listed separately in the upcoming state election on September 22, 2024, as well as the day after, in all forecasts and projections if it receives at least two percent of the vote.
A review shows that the animal protection party reached 2.6 percent of the vote in the 2019 state election, but was not taken into account with its own diagram bar on the election evening. The European elections, in which smaller parties were allowed to discover, mark a clear difference - even if only on the condition of the more relaxed five percent hurdle. In this context, the animal protection party has already successfully opposed the decision of the RBB, as the Berlin-Brandenburg Higher Administrative Court stated in May 2023. A success that has never been set in stone because the RBB has appealed an appeal.
Problem of mentioning smaller parties
The animal welfare party argues that a separate mention in the election programs is crucial to gain new members and acquire donations. It emphasizes that even parties that do not achieve the five percent hurdle are important for political competition. This means that a party takes part in state financing from one percent of the votes. In the present case, a separate mention could influence the votes in different ways.
A central point is that the animal protection party sees the risk of disappearing in the "others" category. Not only legal considerations play a role here, but also the perception of voters. In Thuringia, where the FDP was only mentioned with one percent, for example, the differences between the visibility of larger and smaller parties are obvious. A separate bar for the animal protection party could send an additional signal for political relevance.
the FDP and its visibility
The head of the FDP head of the state, Zyon Braun, expressed his displeasure with the decision and described the load as a "scandal". This illustrates the challenges with which smaller parties are confronted, especially in times of intensive campaigns. While the animal protection party takes care of its mention, the FDP is fighting for a place in the discussion.
summarized, the conflict between the animal protection party and the RBB as well as the difficulties of the FDP to make themselves heard clearly the challenges that smaller parties face. The developments are led to the importance of the media representation for political competition and democratic discussion culture in Brandenburg.
- Nag
Kommentare (0)