Processo contro El Hotzo: battute controverse Trump in tribunale!

Processo contro El Hotzo: battute controverse Trump in tribunale!

Tiergarten, Berlin, Deutschland - Sebastian Hotz, known as "El Hotzo", has to answer to the court due to controversial statements about an assassination attempt on former US President Donald Trump. The Berlin public prosecutor has raised charges because he is said to have promoted the "reward and approval of crimes". The trial is scheduled to begin on July 23, 2023 at the Tiergarten District Court, where only one negotiation day has been planned so far, as a court spokesman confirmed. This information was confirmed by the German Press Agency, which reported on Friday about the indictment, such as [rbb24] (https://www.rbbb24.de/politik/biebtrag/2025/07/sebastian-hotz-el-hotzo-trump-bematstare- process-berlin.html).

The incident that led to this indictment occurred in the summer of 2022 when Hotz published a joke about the shots on Trump on the "X" platform. These statements met with violent criticism and were perceived as inappropriate by many users. Certainly coming in response to public outrage, Hotz deleted the entries later.

The Legal Framework

The indictment refers to §140 of the German Criminal Code, which provides for punishment for the approval of illegal acts if they could disturb public peace. This determination of the law raises questions about freedom of expression that is protected in Germany by the Basic Law (Art. 5 Para. 1 S. 1 GG). The discussion about the limits of this freedom is complex and indispensable, especially in view of public statements on sensitive issues. Another important aspect is that freedom of expression includes not only the free statement of opinions, but also its legal treatment, as bpb explained in one article.

In Germany, political statements enjoy special protection, which means that they can usually be expressed without prosecution. However, there are clear limits, especially if these statements are interpreted as a call to violence or the approval of crimes. The case of Hotz could lead to a legal reassessment and to initiate a debate about the limits of satire and freedom of expression on social media.

public reactions and debates

Since the announcement of the indictment against Hotz, the media and public have been discussing the importance of freedom of expression and its limits. Critics and supporters have taken different points of view: While some believe that Hotz is right to be held accountable, others argue that his statements were expressed in the name of satire and are therefore protected by freedom of expression. This debate is reflected in the broad discussion about the responsibility of individuals in the digital era.

The upcoming negotiation promises not only to be important for Hotz, but also to ensure the entire public debate about freedom of expression and its limits in Germany. The process is eagerly awaited and could have far -reaching implications for dealing with political statements in social networks