Court of custody in Hamburg: Entrepreneur contacts the Federal Constitutional Court

Court of custody in Hamburg: Entrepreneur contacts the Federal Constitutional Court

In the fight for the custody of her children, the Hamburg entrepreneur Christina Block switched on the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe. This happened after an Higher Regional Court had given the jurisdiction in the case and had the feeling that it was not sufficiently heard in this procedure. According to the Hamburg law firm Unger, which Christina Block represents, the constitutional complaint was submitted by a specialized lawyer from Berlin and aims at the maintenance of their rights and those of their children, which are the focus of the legal dispute.

Christina Block and her ex-husband have been in a legal dispute for custody for their two younger children, who are currently around 10 and 13 years old. The children have been living with their father in Denmark since the end of August 2021 after having not returned from a visit to him. This led to a complex legal process that extended over a long time. The Hanseatic Higher Regional Court initially chose the mother and her right of residence in October 2021. However, on February 19, 2024, the court stated that the case was no longer responsible in the case of the consolidated food point of the children in Denmark.

Investigations into childcare

A shock moment for everyone involved was the events on New Year's Eve when the two children were brought to Germany under mysterious circumstances and without prior notice. This action could result in serious legal consequences. A court decision forced the mother to let the children back to Denmark. In this context, Christina Block and her father, the well -known restaurant founder Eugen Block, were targeted by the public prosecutor. The accusation is on the absence of minors, and it is claimed that they could have been actively involved in the organization of this questionable action, possibly even with the help of third parties.

The public prosecutor has already carried out various searches in business and private rooms in order to secure evidence in this delicate matter. Block himself vehemently denied that she had ever given the third party to bring her children back from Denmark. Her father, Eugen Block, told the "Hamburger Abendblatt" that he could no longer comment on it and was not involved in the situation.

The legal uncertainties in the custody dispute

The custody dispute around the block children impressively shows how complicated and stressful such procedures can become, especially if several jurisdictions are affected. Last year, the OLG declared that the matter was no longer responsible for what the children and parents mean various legal challenges. The introduction of the constitutional complaint could be a strategic decision by Christina Block to draw attention to the perceived inconsistencies in the procedure and to explore their legal options.

Overall, the situation remains tense for everyone involved, since the legal disputes can continue to worsen. The complexity of such custody cases is often only really visible if the parents do not agree and the well -being of the children is focused on. It remains to be seen which decisions the Federal Constitutional Court will make with regard to the submitted complaint and what effects they could have on the family situation.

The background of custody disputes

In Germany, custody disputes can often raise far -reaching and complex legal questions. These cases are not only emotionally charged, but also affect various legal levels, especially if they are internationally. English -language terms such as "Custody" or "Youth Welfare" are often used, but the actual German laws and regulations can differ significantly. In the event of disputes about custody, it is particularly important to clarify where the children's place of residence is and how the parental rights are distributed. This can represent additional hurdles for parents who live in different countries.

The further development of the constitutional complaint could possibly also have precedent effects for similar future cases. The legal framework in Germany with regard to custody and parental responsibility are of great importance, not only for those affected, but also for society as a whole. The dissolution of such conflicts is of central importance for the guarantee of the well -being of the children and maintaining legal integrity in family matters.

The custody dispute between Christina Block and her ex-man not only highlights the personal conflicts of those involved, but also raises basic questions about the legal framework for international custody. In Germany, custody is usually regulated according to the Civil Code (BGB), while internationally recognized agreements such as the HAAGER Agreement on the civil law aspects of international child abduction (1980) regulate the return of children to such disputes. These legal conditions show how complicated custody procedures can become, especially if they go beyond national borders.

Especially from the point of view of the child's well-being and the legal representation, a field of tension is created here. The focus is on the question of whether the children should stay in their new center of life in Denmark. The German courts also had to deal with considerations of how stable and safe living conditions can be created in the sense of the child's well -being. The influence of the social service and the psychological expert also plays a role here, which often offer different perspectives on the situation of the children.

legal foundations and their application

The legal basis relevant in this case are anchored in both German law and international law. In particular, the BGB stipulates that the child's welfare represents the highest principle in decisions about custody. In cases where one parent lives in another country, the Hague can apply to ensure that the return of the child to the country of the usual stay does not violate the child's welfare.

HAAGER Agreement: It was implemented in 1980 to prevent international child rests and to facilitate the return of kidnapped children. It aims to restore the usual stay and the associated family structures for the child. In this case, the court will also have to rely on such principles.

legal challenges

Custody disputes are often shaped by emotional conflicts that also make the legal processes complex. An example of this is Christina Block's lawyer's claim that her client was not given legal hearing during the procedure. Such allegations are not only legally significant, but can also have a significant impact on the judgment that was finally made. If a court does not take into account the legal hearing of a party, this could lead to a higher proceedings for the verdict.

The ongoing investigations for suspicion of childbirth are added to a further layer of complexity. Here it is examined whether the mother and her ex-husband may have violated applicable law by trying to bring the children to the court of the court. In such cases, serious legal consequences can follow that affect not only custody but also criminal law.

It is clear that these developments not only affect the private life of those involved, but also have extensive implications for the legal framework in Germany with regard to custody disputes.