Promise safe limits or empty? Green demand clarity in the debate dialogue

Promise safe limits or empty? Green demand clarity in the debate dialogue

Invitation to constructive discussions in asylum policy: Irene Mihalic and the challenges of internal security

In the current discussion on asylum policy, the first parliamentary managing director of the Greens, Irene Mihalic, shows an engagement for open and constructive discussions. Your approach could play an important role in reducing social tensions that often arise in the debate about migration and internal security.

The talks that take place today are of high explosiveness, since they not only affect future asylum policy, but also the stability of democracy in Germany. Mihalic emphasizes that the Greens "do not close themselves from reputable proposals". This reflects an attitude that aims to find a common solution in a political environment perceived as difficult

A critical voice in the debate is Friedrich Merz, whose approach is not acceptable, according to Mihalic. She explains: "Democrats are not concerned with working with Ultimaten." This remark indicates the importance of cooperation in politics, especially in times when populist alternatives are often in the foreground. An empathic and communal approach could help reduce the social exclusion of migrants, which is reinforced by extreme demands.

Mihalic also expresses her skepticism with regard to the demand for more controls at the limits. She notes that the federal police are already heavily burdened, which raises questions about the practical implementation of such measures. It is important to note that additional loads for the police could also affect other safety -related tasks.

Another critical point is the lack of specific measures in the proposed 72-page paper for internal security. Mihalic calls for a comprehensive security package that not only promises, but actually leads to a noticeable increase in security. This could be a crucial aspect to strengthen the trust of citizens in politics.