Merz calls for realignment of migration policy - Scholz is adorned with

Merz calls for realignment of migration policy - Scholz is adorned with

At a one-hour meeting in the Chancellery, Merz held a passionate plea, which can not only be interpreted as a specific invitation to cooperate, but also as an implicit demand for a break in the traffic light coalition. He is certain that the Union and the SPD, together in the Bundestag, have a clear majority, and could possibly initiate fundamental legal changes without the Greens and the FDP.

Scholz 'reaction and the contradiction of the majorities

Friedrich Merz said that the Chancellor urgently had to act in order not to lose the trust of the citizens. "The Chancellor is now slipping its own country," said Merz, referring to the chancellor's powers of guidelines. Nevertheless, Scholz did not get involved in the proposal during the meeting. He expressed that cooperation was necessary, but no changing majorities, which underlines the complexity of the current political situation.

Olaf Scholz confirmed that it was important that opposition leaders like Merz also bring in their suggestions. Nevertheless, he made it clear that international agreements and EU requirements determine the legal framework of German migration policy, which is to be understood as a clear indication of the hurdles that face each reform.

conversations about specific measures and future steps

Merz also brought the idea into play to use the government and the Union, who could examine the possibilities of realigning migration policy. He suggests that in the rapidly approaching Bundestag meeting week in September to branch off half a day for migration policy in order to discuss possible changes in the law. The ideas include the deportation of rejected asylum seekers to Syria and Afghanistan as well as permanent controls at the EU external borders.

The proposals are formulated under the pressure caused by the increasing numbers of irregular migration and the continuing social tensions. Merz also calls for a procedure to enable migrants to reject migrants who have first entered another EU country. In these complex negotiations, the winner of the political arena will still be determined.

The Merz's political strategy is obviously oriented to strengthen your own party and possibly increase the speed of decisions in the migration question, while Scholz determines that such an agreement cannot be made within the existing coalition. The state elections in Saxony and Thuringia will now have to show whether a collaboration between the two major parties will come across joyful acceptance or whether it fails again.

The results and the further development of migration policy will be of great importance in the light of current discussions. It remains to be seen whether the pressing questions that affect both security and integration can be tackled in a way that is both politically and legally portable.

The discussion about migration policy in Germany has a long history and is shaped by various political currents. Historically, the country's migration policy was strongly influenced by the geopolitical developments, international agreements and social needs. A concise example is the situation after the fall of the 1989 wall when Germany experienced a massive increase in migration, especially from the former Eastern Bloc. The challenges that occurred at the time are similar to the current debates on migration, since both times are characterized by a variety of political opinions and a need for legal reforms.

In recent years, migration policy has changed significantly since the 2015 refugee crisis. At that time, Germany opened its limits for a large number of refugees, which led to a social division and numerous political discussions. In this context, for example, the AfD gained influence and changed the political landscape considerably. Similar to today, the migration policy of populist rhetorics and the emergence of parties are influenced that demand a more restrictive migration policy.

political and social framework conditions

Migration policy is strongly embedded in political and legal framework in Germany. International obligations such as the Basic Law that protects human dignity and guarantees the right to asylum, as well as the guidelines of the European Union, play an important role. These legal obligations represent the limits for national decisions and reforms.

A central discussion point in the current political debate is the integration of migrants. Despite the different political positions, there is a broad consensus that successful integration is crucial for social peace and economic stability. Studies by the German Science Center for Social Research show that successful integration is not only an advantage for migrants itself, but also has positive effects on society and the economy (see diw berlin ).

At the same time, many citizens see the increase in migration as a threat to public order and social cohesion. A survey by the Infratest Dimap opinion research institute showed last year that over 60% of the population believed that the federal government has lost control of migration. This perception contributes to polarization in the political debate and makes it difficult to search for common solutions.

Current statistics on migration

The migration scene in Germany is dynamic and is subject to constant changes. According to the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF), over 200,000 asylum applications were made in Germany in 2022, which represents a significant increase compared to previous years. These figures are not only an expression of wars and conflicts in the countries of origin, but also of the deteriorating living conditions for many people worldwide.

In addition, a current investigation shows that several hundred thousand people live illegally in Germany, often without access to social security systems. This group is particularly the focus of political discussions about improving the legal and social framework. According to a survey by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation, around 72% of those surveyed believe that a revision of the existing law is necessary to create fair conditions for asylum seekers and refugees (see Friedrich-ebert-Foundation ).