The Federal Administrative Court prohibited the compact magazine on: AfD parliamentary group leader demands resignation of the Federal Minister of the Interior

The Federal Administrative Court prohibited the compact magazine on: AfD parliamentary group leader demands resignation of the Federal Minister of the Interior

Alice Weidel: Faeser must now take the hat

The Federal Administrative Court temporarily lifted the ban on the "Compact" magazine by the Federal Minister of the Interior in a hurry. This decision has far -reaching consequences for freedom of the press and has led to demands for the resignation of Nancy Faeser. The AfD parliamentary group leader in the German Bundestag, Alice Weidel, sees Faeser's threeth attack on freedom of the press freedom for the office of a 'Minister of the Constitution'.

The decision of the Federal Administrative Court represents an important strengthening of freedom of the press. The court has made it clear that the Federal Minister of the Interior's prohibition was not lawful. This provisional cancellation will continue to be able to publish the “Compact” magazine until the case is finally clarified.

Alice Weidel sees this development a clear reason for the resignation of Nancy Faeser. As a 'Minister of the Constitution', she should protect fundamental rights and freedom of the press and not try to undermine it. Weidel therefore asks Faeser to either step down or be released.

Freedom of the press is a fundamental fundamental right that is indispensable in a democracy. The ban on the "Compact" magazine by the Federal Minister of the Interior is an attack on this fundamental right and signals a dangerous disregard for freedom of expression. It is important that such interventions are not tolerated in the freedom of the press and that those responsible are held accountable.

The case to ban the "Compact" magazine is part of a number of experiments to limit freedom of expression. At a time when the public debate becomes more and more heated and different opinions meet, it is crucial that the freedom of the press remains and that a variety of voices can be heard.

Now it is the political responsibility to respond appropriately to this attack on freedom of the press. The resignation of Nancy Faeser would be a first step in the right direction to restore confidence in freedom of expression and to make it clear that such attacks are not tolerated.

It remains to be seen how the political situation will develop and whether there will be further consequences. The focus should continue to strengthen the freedom of the press and the protection of fundamental rights in order to maintain a democratic and pluralistic society.