Berlin Palestinian demos: Will you really all be prohibited? Consequences for social peace. The police decision.

Berlin Palestinian demos: Will you really all be prohibited? Consequences for social peace. The police decision.

The Berlin police have rejected allegations to ban all Palestinian demos. According to a spokeswoman, both meetings have been banned and held since October 7th. An RBB television report suggests that Palestine demos are banned more often than other meetings. The police check every registration and consider the experience with the applicant and previous events. The behavior of the participants and the attempts by the meeting management to have a calming effect are also relevant. Some applicants from Palestine demos are associated with the right-wing extremist Samidoun network. In the past, anti -Semitic slogans and calls for violence were chanted in the past.

According to a report by the Berliner Zeitung, an integration researcher in the RBB contribution warns of the consequences if even moderate Palestinians hardly find any space for their protest. This could burden social peace.

According to the article, both approved and forbidden Palestine demos were held in Berlin. An example of an approved demo was a spontaneous vigil at the Brandenburg Gate, in which around 350 people took part. A rally on Alexanderplatz was also carried out without trouble. It is emphasized that the police check the meeting registrations individually and that the decision is based on a ban on a hazard forecast. The experiences with the applicant and previous events are also taken into account.

like www.berliner-zeitung.de reports some applicants from Palestine demos are associated with the Samidoun network, which is the foundation of the left-wing extremist terrorist organization "Volksfront for the liberation of Palestine" (PflP). In the past, the same demonstration and anti -Semitic slogans and calls for violence have been scanded in these demos. Based on these experiences, the organizers of such demos probably have little chance of receiving permission in the future.

It should be noted that the article does not provide information about the statements of the integration expert and the legal professor about the situation, but only points out that they have their say in the RBB contribution.